Ink dating albert lyter Free sex slave chatline

posted by | Leave a comment

Alarcon then asked Daniel if he knew that the account numbers, which belonged to Ana Maria’s companies, on the guaranty, did not exist on Nov.

28, 1996, the day the documents were allegedly signed.

Daniel testified that he had “not received anything, personally.” Alarcon suggested that Daniel was not coinciding with the testimony he gave to the Mexican court.

“Are you asking the jury to believe your story,” Alarcon asked Daniel.

Daniel replied that he had no knowledge of the account numbers.

Alarcon then asked Daniel if had testified, in a Mexican court, if he had any knowledge of one of Don Juan’s accounts.

After the three years, there would be no difference in change of the ink, he testified.

Brittingham, on a million promissory note, which had not been paid, according to court documents.

The jury of 10 men and two women found for Cristina Brittingham Sada de Ayala and awarded her 8,240,000 from the defendant, Ana Maria de la Fuente de Brittingham.

In a unanimous decision by the jury, Cristina was awarded compensation for damages in the amount of million, which includes interest; for the defendant’s failure to comply with the agreement, ,490,000 for damages resulting from fraud;

Brittingham, on a $34 million promissory note, which had not been paid, according to court documents.

The jury of 10 men and two women found for Cristina Brittingham Sada de Ayala and awarded her $108,240,000 from the defendant, Ana Maria de la Fuente de Brittingham.

In a unanimous decision by the jury, Cristina was awarded compensation for damages in the amount of $47 million, which includes interest; for the defendant’s failure to comply with the agreement, $59,490,000 for damages resulting from fraud; $1.5 million for fraudulent transfer and $250,000 for exemplary damages.

BY ERICK SANTOS Times staff writer An expert witness for the plaintiff testified on Tuesday at the 341st District Court that the scientific examination that he performed on a signature on a $34 million note had been signed prior to 1996.

Forensic chemist Eric Speckin told the jury that a signature by Ana Maria de la Fuente de Brittingham was placed on the $34 million promissory note and guaranty in 1996.

||

Brittingham, on a $34 million promissory note, which had not been paid, according to court documents.The jury of 10 men and two women found for Cristina Brittingham Sada de Ayala and awarded her $108,240,000 from the defendant, Ana Maria de la Fuente de Brittingham.In a unanimous decision by the jury, Cristina was awarded compensation for damages in the amount of $47 million, which includes interest; for the defendant’s failure to comply with the agreement, $59,490,000 for damages resulting from fraud; $1.5 million for fraudulent transfer and $250,000 for exemplary damages.BY ERICK SANTOS Times staff writer An expert witness for the plaintiff testified on Tuesday at the 341st District Court that the scientific examination that he performed on a signature on a $34 million note had been signed prior to 1996.Forensic chemist Eric Speckin told the jury that a signature by Ana Maria de la Fuente de Brittingham was placed on the $34 million promissory note and guaranty in 1996.

.5 million for fraudulent transfer and 0,000 for exemplary damages.

BY ERICK SANTOS Times staff writer An expert witness for the plaintiff testified on Tuesday at the 341st District Court that the scientific examination that he performed on a signature on a million note had been signed prior to 1996.

Forensic chemist Eric Speckin told the jury that a signature by Ana Maria de la Fuente de Brittingham was placed on the million promissory note and guaranty in 1996.

Leave a Reply

Free online hot sex chat sighs