Radiocarbon dating an archaeological perspective taylor lesbian dating search site atlanta georgia
No attempt has been made to add references, although they were tagged a while back already.
Should these non-referenced statements be removed now, in terms of WP: Policy?
This article is within the scope of Wiki Project Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia.
They tend to be the more contentious statements, and almost all of them are casting unsubstantiated doubt on the validity of the C14 process and on the integrity of the people concerned.
The text is recommended for archaeologists who want to know more about the theories and principles behind radiocarbon dating, its techniques, and its application in their field.
The book will also be good for physicists who want to work with archaeologists and apply their knowledge in radiocarbon dating.
Amended Slow Jog (talk) , 20 April 2009 (UTC) Harry Gove calculated that 71% of the sample must be non original to bias the data. I also don't think that Jull, a staunch critic of Kouznetzov, implied that this was the case, although I don't have access rights to view the article.
Possibly misinterpreted by original author of this section?